Despite a digital revolution that’s created even more opportunities to transmit images, voices and stories, the public finds itself further removed from what’s really happening on the front lines. However, in the country’s myriad military conflicts since Vietnam, this flow of information has been largely transformed, and it is now more difficult to see the human consequences of military operations. In this sense, media coverage contributed to the flow of information that’s vital to any functioning democracy, and pushed Americans to either support or oppose U.S. The New Yorker’s Michael Arlen dubbed Vietnam the “living room war.” The images of the war – viewed on evening news shows on the country’s three networks – enabled the public to understand the war’s human costs. In describing the reaction, Safer would later say that the public, the media and the military all began to realize that the rules of war reporting had changed. The only death had been the boy, and not a single weapon had been uncovered. But according to Safer, no pitched battle had taken place. The military command later claimed that the unit had received enemy fire. Safer and his crew caught it all on film. Using cigarette lighters and a flamethrower, the troops proceeded to burn down 150 houses, wound three women, kill one child and take four men prisoner. marines on a search-and-destroy mission to the Vietnamese village of Cam Ne. In August 1965, Morley Safer, a reporter for “CBS News,” accompanied a unit of U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |